In the aftermath of June 15, the prevailing advice in the investment community has transitioned to a strategy centered on reductionary tactics, suggesting that market participants should refrain from new entries while focusing solely on exits. As we approach July, however, the sentiment shifts, with recommendations to engage in selective entry strategies by targeting specific sectors. Emphasis remains on maintaining a hopeful outlook for markets below the 3200 point mark, while August indicates a strategy of opportunistic buying in industries such as real estate and automotive, subsequently adopting a more passive stance.

Looking ahead to August, analysts predict a minor adjustment at the start of the month as an expected correction following the significant upward movement seen in July. It is anticipated that mid to late August will witness a rebound restoring market levels to a “V” shaped movement. Forecasts show upper ranges settling around the 3320 mark and lower limits hovering close to 3215, suggesting a conducive environment for reclaiming the 3400 level in the third quarter.

Recent rumors surrounding the Chinese A-shares market suggest a sudden shift to a “T+0” trading model and a reduction in transaction stamp duties, but such changes seem improbable in the near future, especially the T+0 system, which is likely unattainable within the next five years. This approach has traditionally positioned itself to protect retail investors, who currently make up over 70% of the market and are primarily active traders — yet find themselves grappling with significant losses.

Advertisement

Transitioning to a T+0 model could hasten the decline of these small investors, undermining the foundational health of the market. The predominant market behavior for retail investors is fraught with competition against algorithmic trading and institutional investors, where the trading dynamics are defined by fractions of seconds and computer-driven transactions. Any potential reforms will likely reflect concepts previously floated—a limited, blue-chip based T+0 model rather than a complete overhaul.

Speculation about the reduction of stamp duties appears similarly premature, as historical instances, such as those in 2005 and 2008, show that cuts are generally implemented in dire market conditions without altering long-term trends. Trends indicate that despite temporary boosts, markets tend to hit new lows thereafter. The power to set stamp duties lies more in the hands of fiscal departments than the securities regulator, who do not possess the requisite market insight to initiate such changes simply due to market downturns.

In terms of bullish sentiment surrounding brokerage firms, five key rationales underlie the current optimistic outlook:

1. The kickstart for brokers stems from government policy endorsing “active capital markets.” This sentiment, as the bellwether for bull market trends, cannot overlook the critical role that brokers play in delivering outstanding performance in the financial sector.

After a 15% surge, brokerage stocks serve as a barometer for future gains. A further climb by another 15% could empower the Shanghai Composite Index to surpass the 3700 threshold, a desirable target for many investors. Moreover, if performance soars beyond a 27% increase, it would set new highs for the first time since the market crisis, paving the way for the index to potentially reach 4000 — signaling the onset of a robust bull market.

2. The emerging concept of “Special Central Enterprises Valuation” is highly applicable here. This approach underscores the value of state-owned and central enterprises, alongside many brokerages that remain undervalued in historical context, indicating substantial growth potential.

3. From a market positioning perspective, brokers, banks, and insurance companies form an integral part of the financial ecosystem. Current public holdings barely touch 3.5%, while financial and real estate sectors typically account for over 10% of GDP. Such dynamics align with market recovery trends that steer clear of heavily concentrated public stocks.

4. For the brokerage industry, a push to build “carrier-grade” firms has been stagnant since introduced in 2018, though chatter about industry consolidations is beginning to circulate.

5. Examining short-term trading trends reflects this current wave as the first significant active sector since the market rally of 2019, with major players like CITIC leading the charge. In previous sectors where brokers saw surges, they primarily played catch-up, but this occurrence presents a refreshing departure, hinting at newfound strength.

My advice to investors in the brokerage space is to contemplate low-entry opportunities, eyeing a gain potential of 13%, marking a movement from 130,000 points up to around 148,000. This midpoint aligns with the projected upward trend of the Shanghai Composite Index achieving the 3700 mark this year.

Presently, the brokerage arena is highly competitive, prompting a focus on leading firms and those with unique attributes. Caution is advised against speculation around too volatile stocks; like "Pacific Securities," which reflects the volatility of low-priced stocks undergoing market corrections potentially tied to changes in major shareholder agreements. With the notable acquisition by Huachuang Securities last year, further approvals from the regulatory body remain pending, causing uncertainty as the firm has already seen a 80% profit increase within that timeframe.

Meanwhile, the automotive sector has yet to complete its rebound, as numerous manufacturers engage in inventory reduction strategies, reaching discount levels as deep as 30% in the first half of the year. This presents a clear focal point for analysis as it uncovers two compelling factors:

1. In the arena of new energy vehicles (NEVs), China stands as a frontrunner on the global stage. Besides high-speed rail, NEVs remain our most prominent competitive export category, demonstrating significant year-on-year sales growth which aligns with governmental policy aimed at seizing international markets.

2. When juxtaposed against traditional automakers, NEVs operate on a distinctly advantageous profit margin. Although BYD’s profits currently only account for one-eighth of Tesla’s, market penetration strategies planned for the near future are poised to significantly improve profitability.

Clearly, the market stands strong behind NEVs, as evidenced by substantial gains exceeding 15% in July. This momentum may persist, with projections hinting at a possible rebound beyond 50% in the latter half of the year, although specifics will require time to materialize.

Conversations surrounding the real estate sector have stalled, largely echoing the policy adjustment anticipations reminiscent of last year. I remains that any upward moves are likely to be merely technical rebounds following severe sell-offs, with limited overall potential. The core policies continue to revolve around ensuring delivery and safeguarding citizen's welfare, indicating future demand primarily revolves around upgrading existing homes rather than production of new ones.

The prevailing real estate policies are simply reestablishing a sense of balance by lifting previously stringent restrictions. Current offerings may align better with general market supply, while demand signals suggest a gradual easing of purchasing limits in order to stabilize market activity.

At present, investors are keenly awaiting further policy concrete implementations. If successfully enacted, state-owned enterprises are likely to blossom, while the fate of the sizeable private sector remains uncertain, with many set to face inevitable exit scenarios. In a longer-term perspective, investment opportunities in real estate may lean towards the reconstruction and merger aspects that have been consistently highlighted.

The advent of opportunities in the realm of Artificial Intelligence

The year 2023 heralds a significant acceleration within the AI sector, as seen in the remarkable performance during the first half of the year, with two primary phases of growth. The initial phase in March and April prioritized speculation driven by anticipated trends rather than earnings, propelling many stocks attached to AI concepts skyward. The second phase, motivated by Nvidia's unexpected earnings, observed temporary pullbacks for several investments, while the number of stocks with continued upward potential markedly decreased.

A third wave lies ahead, yet further growth will necessitate substantial engagements yielding tangible outcomes, whether through actual profit realization or by showcasing breakthrough applications. Given current trajectories, key players within subdivided AI sectors are likely to showcase autonomous performance similar to the trajectories observed post-2020 across reputable areas like the liquor and energy sectors.

In sum, August’s market patterns, given current trading volumes, suggest challenges in sustaining simultaneous rebounds across numerous segments. The present trading activities remain unstable, indicating that once sectors like finance and real estate pull back, the marketplace could struggle to identify new driving forces, leading to fluctuating volumes.

Should the market fail to maintain sustained transaction activity around the trillion mark, a rotation style is expected to emerge, mandating investor preparedness for segment shifts. Fund managers and participants should steer clear of impulsive actions rooted in chasing gains, instead opting to wait for corrections before engaging anew, without being deterred by fluctuations.